But these were people we knew, from our districts, people who ran on caring about our public schools, about children, and their teachers.
That is from the post below, written by Cheryl Binkley, who recently retired from teaching for more than 15 years in the Fairfax County Public School system in Virginia.
In this post, she takes a tough look at what the school board in Fairfax is doing in regard to the pension fund for its teachers and other employees and, possibly, what is happening in the entire county. Though Fairfax is one of the wealthiest in the country, it has long lagged behind neighboring districts in teacher pay.
Now the grandparent of a student in the system, she is a member of the Badass Teachers Association — an organization that formed in 2013 to resist standardized test-based school reform — and she blogs at Third Millennium Teacher. She gave me permission to publish this piece.
(Correction: An earlier version of this post incorrectly described a motion by board member Schultz. It has been corrected.)
Advertisement
By Cheryl Binkley
On March 2, I went with three friends to a meeting of the McLean Citizens Association. We drove through the magnificent neighborhoods among McMansions, Real Mansions, and Really Real Mansions, admiring the Gated Houses and Gated Developments. It was fabulous, beautiful, like visiting another world.
I don’t see these kind of neighborhoods that often because I live on the other side of the county, among 60s split levels and 50s three- and four-bedroom bricks on a slab or over a basement. Older homes are nestled here and there among the classic early suburban landscape. My neighborhood is filled with teachers, plumbers, bakers, firefighters, policemen, small business owners, carpenters, and mechanics — and I love it. But I’ve gotta admit, McLean is spectacular.
The reason for our visit was to observe the McLean Citizens Association’s meeting on our teachers’ pension plan. The association had recently come out swinging in The Washington Post and local papers at ERFC, the Fairfax teachers’ supplemental retirement plan, and we wanted to get a feel for what it was about.
Advertisement
The recommendations they had for the people who teach in the McLean and Fairfax County Public Schools was that their pension plan be privatized and reduced to mostly what the teachers themselves could contribute from their $47,000 starting salary, or $58,000 average salaries.
After all, the people whose homes I was driving by insisted, we don’t have those generous retirement plans like ERFC, which pays retirees an average of $1,429 a month. That $1.429 is from deferred compensation and the employees’ own contributions, and out of that $1.429 the cost of teachers’ personally paid health insurance is deducted, making take-home pay considerably less.
The average household income in McLean, according to the Census Bureau is well over $164,000 per household, and over $194,000 for families. Single guys in McLean make an average of $132,000.
Advertisement
Of course, I’m glad for them that they do, well done, and would never go to the newspapers to recommend their hard-earned money be taken away, but comparing teachers’ delayed compensation to their own portfolios, golden parachutes, and stock options might be a better comparison than “you’ve got a pension plan, and I don’t.”
On Monday, April 24, and on Thursday night, April 27, I went to more meetings. These were of the Fairfax County School Board.
These meetings were for the final deliberations and vote on an FCPS budget proposal that would cut ERFC — not about privatizing the plan immediately; that would be too expensive, but about reducing benefits for teachers with under five years or new hires — the first step.
The first meeting on Monday was seven hours long. When all the community attendees arrived at the scheduled time, the board left the public observers sitting, waiting, for the first 1 ½ hours while the board members excused themselves to go into closed session. They would go into closed session for another hour later in the day before finishing the meeting. My friends and I sat and waited through both delays while the board attended to other more important matters.
Advertisement
To fully understand, it’s important to know that ERFC has been a well-managed pension system, not in danger of failing, conforming to best practices consistently, and performing well compared to national plans.
On Monday, my friends and I watched as the board questioned the ERFC managers and coordinators vigorously and with less than professional respect at times. It became progressively more clear, based on their questioning, that the board was all over the map in their relative understandings of large-scale investment and pension funds, with most having little experience, expertise, or self-education in the area.
It also became clear that the proposal to reduce ERFC, which had been published as part of the 2018 budget back in September, was a fixed goal, not a possible consideration as most budget items are.
Advertisement
The second meeting, on Thursday night, April 27, was the business meeting, where it would all be decided. That one lasted until after 11 p.m. and also included a hiatus for a closed meeting while the board went into closed session.
The board was arrayed, as always, across the front of the stage and the house was pretty full, but not standing room only. Teachers have a hard time doing weekday evening meetings. They have necessary second jobs, papers to grade, family requirements, and often small children, but many, who could not be there, had called, emailed, or in another way sent their concern.
The reasons the board had been giving since September for the ERFC changes was to give teachers raises, help balance the budget, and establish the long-term health of the fund.
Had we been suspicious, we might have suspected that this was not entirely authentic. The projected savings was $4.7 million for this year, and the board had $22 million in general carry-over they could have used, an additional $8 million dedicated to the boards’ own “special projects” carry-over, and they were spending $2.4 million on a computer program to add additional testing and data collection for all elementary schools.
Advertisement
But these were people we knew, from our districts, people who ran on caring about our public schools, about children, and their teachers.
Megan McLaughlin and Tom Wilson, in a last-ditch effort to stop the changes, presented a motion to postpone the decision for no longer than a year, for more study. After all, the proposed changes if directed to salaries for this year would give each employee $200 a piece for the year, not enough to cover much of anything. The cuts would not seriously relieve budget woes in a $2.7 billion proposed budget — and the fund is not in trouble unless Fairfax pulls its contributions. They said there is no hurry; we can wait a year.
The rest of the board denied the motion to postpone, and at the end of the day, most voted to cut what would amount to 3 percent of ERFC benefits from all new hires who start on or after July 1, 2017. (Voting to cut new hires’ pensions was Hynes, Schultz, Strauss, Evans, Moon, Kaufax, & McElveen,)
Advertisement
The new plan would also require our 2017-18 first-year teachers and all after to work well over 30 years for a retirement. A 22-year-old would have to work 37 years, and a 25-year-old, 34 years, before being eligible for the reduced benefits.
The cherry on the cake was yet to come though. Elizabeth Schultz presented one final motion after all was done. She proposed a working group on both county and school pensions. It was decided they did not need to include all employee compensation in her motion because they had already initiated a joint study group that would study how they could change compensation for All County and School employees, it would consist of Sharon Bulova and Sandy Evans, and their respective budget chairs.
The Working Group was approved, with only Ryan McElveen voting no. Chair Sandy Evans and Schultz agreed from the stage that it should not be a large or far-ranging working group made up of citizens and stakeholders, but should be comprised of three Board of Supervisors members and three Interested School Board members.
Next year, it would not be 3 percent of retirement for newbies, everything would be on the table — on both the county side and the school side.
As I walked out of the meeting after 11, I recognized several of the McLean Citizens Association members sitting with their laptops up and running. They were smiling.
In my quiet house in my working-class neighborhood, I didn’t get to sleep until 4 a.m.
ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7uK3SoaCnn6Sku7G70q1lnKedZLumw9JomKerp5q%2Fbr%2FHnpytZ6elfHN8kHBmaW1fZX9wtMCsZK2glWKzorXRn5ixZZOkwq%2FA2GaqnKCfpLlurs6aqZ1lmqrAtXnDnpqlmaKasW7DwKtkqKZdqbKir8eeqaxn